A Math Class in 2245: Dialogue of the Future

Teacher, “Today we’re going to examine a very simple mathematical trick known as usury.  This simple trick was inflicted upon the public for many centuries, and the process is an important lesson from history.

We will examine how allowing a central hub for currency creation was a moral crime.  The entities known as the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the ECB absorbed the energy of most of humanity.   In essence, the central banks were a tool for the elites of that period to live like a nest of parasites.

Although we are not too sure of the exact date, evidence suggests that the process of usury ended around 2015 and the consequences were abrupt, severe, and not something that we should forget too hastily.

Like I mentioned, the mathematics of usury is very simple and very subtle.  Ultimately, any usury system will either collapse through default or rapidly hyper-inflate into worthlessness.  This is because a usury system is a faith-based system.

Between the years 2012-2015 there was a mixture of usury systems being used by the global elite.  The euro and the $US were the primary currencies of that disturbed period, and were especially relevant in the Rothschild-Windsor-Rockefeller controlled Anglo-sphere.

The euro and the $US had the same basic mathematics but had one crucial difference: the $US was controlled by two centres – the FED and Washington – whilst the euro was influenced by a wide variety of entities including many national parliaments, central banks, and a USSR-style bureaucracy known as the European Union.

This crucial social difference affected the mathematical outcome.  The euro collapsed through defaults whereas the $US hyper-inflated.

We shall address this topic in more depth at a later date.  Today we shall simply focus on the underpinning mathematics of usury.

To understand it better, I wish to quickly recap that currency creation means just that: the creation of currency.  There are a variety of ways this can be done including the minting of coins with different metals, bullion bars, paper, and digital binary code.  Although today, in 2245, we are sensible enough to use actual money and we mint our coins using a mixture of metals based on weight measurements, the folk of 1980-2015 had become increasingly dependent of binary code generated currency.  This allowed fraud to escalate year-on-year through hidden means such as computer generated trading platforms.

When currency is created with usury it is created as a debt not as an asset.  The elite of that period had managed to engineer a usury system so subtle that the public actually didn’t realise their central government and central bank were working in cahoots.

Let’s look at a step-by-step stage breakdown of a typical start-up to a usury system.

  1.  The central government issues a bond.
  2. The central bank purchases the bond.
  3. The central government then repays the currency with interest added over time.

It is that simple.

Let’s look at the math again using a $100billion ‘start-up’ to a usury-based currency.

  1. The central government issues a 1-year bond for $100billion at 5%.
  2. The central bank purchases the bond.
  3. Over the course of a year the government pays the central bank $105billion.

So, to conclude class:

  1. Usury practiced by a central government and central bank is a system of debt-enslavement
  2. The math are simple and subtle and require a docile unsuspecting public for it to work
  3. The 2012-2015 time frame saw many usury systems collapsing in two distinct manners

Does anyone believe the ban on usury should be lifted?”

Post-script/pre-script from 2012: Look at stage two again.  In the early days of the Rothschild-controlled debt-system, they actually used gold.  Nowadays it is primarily data entries on computer systems.  They create the currency out of ‘thin air’, at zero risk to any of their capital.  It’s the end game, so wake up quickly folks.

6 comments to A Math Class in 2245: Dialogue of the Future

  • mong00se

    Johnny Rothschild raises his hand.

  • marz

    Professor, so you are saying that:
    The central government issues a bond (which is an IOU)
    The central bank purchases the bond (with another IOU)
    The central government then repays the currency with interest added over time (more IOU)
    Isn´t that a little crazy?

    • Gareth

      Teacher: “To us in 2245 it does seem extremely crazy, but the majority of citizens in 2012 failed to understand and were completely unaware they were enslaved via the usury process. Some, rather foolishly, believed their governemt was the answer thus failing to see a central government issuing bonds was a key to their enslavement.
      However, small groups throughout the world did understand. They established currency systems based on precious metal and semi-precious metal coins. These small groups were yours and my forefathers and foremothers, marz. Thank you for contributing with an excellent point”
      :-)

  • Country Codger

    Hi Gareth,
    Hope everything is well with you and your sweetie. I hope, let’s all hope, that usury WILL be banned forevermore and will not even rank as a footnote in history lest someone tries it again.
    CC

    • All’s well, cheers CC.
      I reckon there will be a universal ban on usury in most places of the world.
      Keep on exposing just how dangerous the system is for now. It’s parasitical isn’t it?
      Peace

  • Al

    If the medium of exchange is a real thing, a commodity, as gold (or silver, or…), usury (“interest”) can be tolerated as long as sufficient gold (or silver, or…) can be mined each year to pay the usury. Of course, that is net mining, as some of the gold must be given to the miners, smelters, transporters, etc. to support them.
    Credit (debt) “money,” or “phoney money,” whether actual bills of credit (pieces of paper, clay, whatever writing material) with words representing units of the medium inscribed on them, or electronic accounting entries, has a severe problem: the issuer must have a monopoly on the issue of the units or everyone and his brother who has a paper mill, an ink laboratory and a printing press, or today, a computer, will issue units as suits himself.
    As the issuer has (must have) a monopoly, the only “mine” to get more units to pay the usury is the issuing office (usually called a “treasury” or a “bank”).
    If every unit of phoney money was returned to the issuer (assuming none had been lost, burned, etc.), the usury would still be owed and would be accruing (at compound rate) until paid.
    Unfortunately the only place to get the additional phoney money is to borrow it from the issuer. So the debt cannot be paid off. Perpetual debt. The taxpayers are slaves to the money creators/lenders for life and throughout their generations.
    The only way to deal with the present system when it begins to accelerate to hyperinflation is to write the debt off or to foreclose and sell the world all over again. On credit, of course. Or to abolish the moneylending at usury system entirely.
    Note: The “proper” term for “phoney money” is “fiat” currency.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Support our fight with a one time donation.

Over 300+ Videos