Stopping Mass Murderers Would Be Easy If Psychiatrists Were Psychics: Communist goals #38 and #39 now in effect.

forward

Stopping Mass Murderers Would Be Easy If Psychiatrists Were Psychics

|Jan. 16, 2013 12:22 pm

A front-page story in today’s New York Times notes how difficult it is to predict which of the country’s many weird or troubled people will be tomorrow’s Adam Lanza:

No one but a deeply disturbed individual marches into an elementary school or a movie theater and guns down random, innocent people.

That hard fact drives the public longing for a mental health system that produces clear warning signals and can somehow stop the violence. And it is now fueling a surge in legislative activity, in Washington and New York.

But these proposed changes and others like them may backfire and only reveal how broken the system is, experts said.

“Anytime you have one of these tragic cases like Newtown, it’s going to expose deficiencies in the mental health system, and provide some opportunity for reform,” said Richard J. Bonnie, a professor of public policy at the University of Virginia’s law school who led a state commission that overhauled policies after the 2007 Virginia Tech shootings that left 33 people dead. “But you have to be very careful not to overreact.”

The gun control law signed yesterday by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, for instance, requires “mental health professionals” (including psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, and nurses) to report any patient/client whom they think “is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others.” Based on that report, that person may lose his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. In addition to the constitutional issues raised by this provision, there are practical problems. It is not hard to see how this requirement might “backfire.” As I suggested yesterday, it may deter troubled gun owners from seeking help, exactly the opposite of what mental health reformers say they want. Or it may discourage them from being candid about their problems. And if the motivation for the reporting requirement is preventing mass shootings, why include people who might harm themselves? That casts a pretty wide net:

“The way I read the new law, it means I have to report voluntary as well as involuntary hospitalizations, as well as many people being treated for suicidal thinking, for instance, as outpatients,” said Dr. Paul S. Appelbaum, director of the Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry at Columbia University’s medical school. “That is a much larger group of people than before, and most of whom will never be a serious threat to anyone.”

That is true even of people diagnosed with schizophrenia, the vast majority of whom do not commit violent crimes. Furthermore, mass murderers typically receive such diagnoses (often rendered at a distance by op-ed pundits) only after they’ve committed their crimes. Mental health reforms based on the premise that psychiatrists can predict the future are bound to fail, violating the civil liberties of many harmless people in the process. As Northeatern University criminologist James Alan Fox, an expert on mass shootings, observes, “People cannot be denied their Second Amendment rights just because they look strange or act in an odd manner.”

Source: http://reason.com/blog/2013/01/16/stopping-mass-murderers-would-be-easy-if

‘Not taking any chances’
New York’s expanded gun law signed by Cuomo on January 15 goes further than most state laws in that it requires mental health professionals to report any person considered “likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others” to local health officials. Those officials would be authorized to report that person to law enforcement, which could seize the person’s firearms.

Source: http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/18/16588357-anger-violent-thoughts-are-you-too-sick-to-own-a-gun?lite

well waddya know…

http://blackquillandink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/communist-goals-38-39.jpg

from the ‘The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goals’ listed in Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].  

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

1 comment to Stopping Mass Murderers Would Be Easy If Psychiatrists Were Psychics: Communist goals #38 and #39 now in effect.

  • Psychiatrists are remarkably disgraceful people. They define most “depression” as on the part of women, because they’re mostly men, and they do want women, not men, coming to see them. Rapes do occur. Dr. Harold Sleeper of Oklahoma City injected his wife with her own piss. Flagler’s Law in Florida, way back, was made so he could have his wife taken to insane asylum. You get a mental illness the same way a machine slaps a label on a can; except the machine nearly always slaps the right label on. Let these bastards be “denied food and water for a radius of 400 miles around Rome,” so to speak. And they want to mess up your schoolboys with monstrous drugs.

Support our fight with a one time donation.

colloidal-silver-hydrosol-banner-175x263

Over 300+ Videos